4636 位用户此时在线
24小时点击排行 Top 10:
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高,信息越新,排列越靠前
6
2
1
1
7
2
1
1
8
I just read the Grokipedia entry of yours truly. It is exponentially fuller and better than the one of Wikipedia. The only problem is that Grokipedia does not mention my ridiculous good looks nor does it reference my otherworldly silky soccer skills. Otherwise, excellent job
2
1
1
I just read the Grokipedia entry of yours truly. It is exponentially fuller and better than the one of Wikipedia. The only problem is that Grokipedia does not mention my ridiculous good looks nor does it reference my otherworldly silky soccer skills. Otherwise, excellent job
btc
(
twitter.com)
•
Gad Saad
11
2
1
1
17
If you're in academia or an engineer trying to find information and you often end up on Wikipedia, you should definitely switch to Grokipedia
2
1
1
If you're in academia or an engineer trying to find information and you often end up on Wikipedia, you should definitely switch to Grokipedia
Grokipedia offers information that is corrected and fact-checked by AI using a first-principles physics perspective, comes with the
btc
(
twitter.com)
•
X Freeze
23
2
1
1
24
2
1
1