11460 位用户此时在线
24小时点击排行 Top 10:
- 本站自动实时分享网络热点
- 24小时实时更新
- 所有言论不代表本站态度
- 欢迎对信息踊跃评论评分
- 评分越高,信息越新,排列越靠前
搜索数据不够精准? 请点击上面👆👆👆其它时间段筛选试试吧!
3
PM Carney’s first China visit was never just a courtesy call. Beijing framed it as a “turning point” because it wants concrete concessions, especially market access for its heavily subsidized EVs, stable energy supplies, and greater political latitude, and most of all, the “face”
2
1
1
PM Carney’s first China visit was never just a courtesy call. Beijing framed it as a “turning point” because it wants concrete concessions, especially market access for its heavily subsidized EVs, stable energy supplies, and greater political latitude, and most of all, the “face”
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:00:30
5
2
1
1
7
Canada still tends to approach trade with China as if it were mainly about economics. In practice, it rarely is. Talk of a new “strategic partnership” risks obscuring a basic reality. China hasn’t changed how it uses trade, investment, and diplomacy as tools of state power.
2
1
1
Canada still tends to approach trade with China as if it were mainly about economics. In practice, it rarely is. Talk of a new “strategic partnership” risks obscuring a basic reality. China hasn’t changed how it uses trade, investment, and diplomacy as tools of state power.
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:00:45
8
The real danger in Canada-China trade isn’t scale. It’s over-dependence.
2
1
1
The real danger in Canada-China trade isn’t scale. It’s over-dependence.
China can buy Canadian goods, but it’s risky to let a sector or company become so dependent on the Chinese market that Beijing can use that dependence to apply political pressure. That isn’t a hypothetical.
时政
(
twitter.com)
00:01:37
10
2
1
1