Speaking of conceptual ambiguity, if not deception, your entire argument rests on state-promoted assumptions that are blatantly false, as you said “Your entire argument rests on one assumption-the so-called "undetermined status of Taiwan." But that logic has already been superseded by the modern international framework: UN Resolution 2758 and the globally recognized one-China policy.”

1. UN Resolution 2738 is deeply flawed and it NEVER superseded anything regarding Taiwan’s sovereignty, see my detailed analysis here: https://t.co/lVZUhKau02 All US administrations, Dem or GOP, agree with me on this and have completely rejected PRC’s and your deceptive interpretation;
   
   
2. Where is your “globally recognized One-China policy” that explicitly endorses the PRC’s and your claim that Taiwan should be part of China? There is no such a thing except in Beijing’s imagination. Again, more details refuting such a deceptive claim is here, published by Hoover no less: https://t.co/rZ7g8AuwXq