The idea that Kirk used stupid college students as fodder to mine for clicks just fundamentally misunderstands what's demonstrated in these clips.

The students can't provide a coherent, non-circular answer to questions like "what is a woman" because no coherent, non-circular answers exist within transgender dogma. There is no grown up version of this ideology. You never progress beyond what's in the children's books.

When you ask anyone of any age to defend the ideology, some may be more confident in their rendition of the dogma, some may use more facile rhetorical gambits, but none will say anything fundamentally different than "a woman is anyone who says they a woman."

It's why the Brown University psychology professor ends up asking Matt Walsh "Does a chicken cry? Does a chicken commit suicide?" in What is a Woman. The Ivy League professor is not any more competent or skilled than the college sophomore. It's why No Debate has always been the rule, why censorship and shaming came before any attempt to persuade, why no attempt to persuade was ever made, and why the recourse to state coercion, threats of violence, and the commission of violence, have accompanied this movement from day one more than anything else that has ever portrayed itself as a civil rights movement ever has.